After listening to both Obama and McCain's speeches witch of the two do you think presented the better speech? Please be honest on your selection. If you want you can give details on why you think made their speech good or bad.
6 comments:
Anonymous
said...
McCain's speech was by far better than Obama's. It spoke the truth and it spoke it from the heart. McCain's speech was positive and spoke the truth about what McCain would do if elected President. McCain's speech also spoke the truth about what Obama would do if elected President. Obama's speech was very negative and spoke lies of McCain and what he would do if elected President.
I believe that Obama gave the better speech. I feel that he rallied more hope and more sentiment amongst his party than McCain could ever dream to arise. I, like Howard, feel that Obama's speech also came from the heart and spoke the truth. If Howard thinks Obama's speech was negative, then he must feel that Sarah Palin's speech was unmercifully cruel because she was far more disrespectful than Obama's brief quips specifically against McCain. Just because Palin chose not to say Obama does not mean the public is blind to whom she is insulting.
I think that even though McCain had the advantage of going last and seeing how everyone else preformed, he still lacked the support that Obama got and the eloquence of Palin. Because of this i feel that Obama's speech was better presented.
Also McCain turned me off with that yellow smile....
time to address my points and the responses I got: The truth was that Palin's speech was negative. I admitted that. I also admitted that Palin's speech was true as well as McCain's. Did you hear Obama's speech? Tying McCain to Bush is as low class as it gets because McCain is no way another George W. Bush. He has many differences with Bush regarding many political issues. Democrat strategy. Also, Obama took McCain's answer out of context when Obama mentioned in his speech that McCain considered someone middle class as someone that made 5million dollars or more. The context of that was in an interview when McCain answered that way in a joke and he even said afterward that Obama would use that out of context and use it entirely out of context he did. The truth was that Obama's speech was negative, but negative in a bad way because it didn't paint diferences between McCain and him. It attacked McCain on the basis of lies, argueing that McCain would be as bad as these past 8 years. That McCain is more of the same, when in reality, Obama's politics represent change for the worse. If you took a REAL listen at Palin's speech, it was harsh. It was critical of Obama. But it was honest and not untrue like Obama's quips against McCain. Many great lines from Palin's speech was negative by attacking Obama but spoke the truth. One of my favorites that I will remember forever: "Some people [referring to Obama] use change to promote their careers, while some people, like John McCain, use their careers to promote change!!!" That attack on Obama is absolutely true because McCain has spent his entire career in Congress promoting change and making lives of Americans better. He has passed legislation that helps American families. Obama puts his party and his politics before his country when he never once refused to reach across the aisle to work with Republicans whil McCain has spent his entire career as a maverick and reached across the aisle to work with Democrats too many times to count. McCain has consistently put his country first, his party second. Obama has not. He has cared about his political gain over his country and is the typical kind of politician in Washington. As Joe Liebermann said, "These are not ordinary times. This is no ordinary election. And John McCain is no ordinary man!" Palin's attacks on Obama were not insulting because they spoke the truth while Obama's attacks on McCain were truly insulting because they lied about McCain. There are facts to back up Palin's attacks on Obama. There are no facts to back up Obama's attacks on McCain because they simply aren't true.
So after you read that long response of mines to Kristi's comment, please check out my blog in which I do put up new political posts/news every single day:
6 comments:
McCain's speech was by far better than Obama's. It spoke the truth and it spoke it from the heart. McCain's speech was positive and spoke the truth about what McCain would do if elected President. McCain's speech also spoke the truth about what Obama would do if elected President. Obama's speech was very negative and spoke lies of McCain and what he would do if elected President.
I believe that Obama gave the better speech. I feel that he rallied more hope and more sentiment amongst his party than McCain could ever dream to arise. I, like Howard, feel that Obama's speech also came from the heart and spoke the truth. If Howard thinks Obama's speech was negative, then he must feel that Sarah Palin's speech was unmercifully cruel because she was far more disrespectful than Obama's brief quips specifically against McCain. Just because Palin chose not to say Obama does not mean the public is blind to whom she is insulting.
(I took your question kinda literally)
I think that even though McCain had the advantage of going last and seeing how everyone else preformed, he still lacked the support that Obama got and the eloquence of Palin. Because of this i feel that Obama's speech was better presented.
Also McCain turned me off with that yellow smile....
time to address my points and the responses I got: The truth was that Palin's speech was negative. I admitted that. I also admitted that Palin's speech was true as well as McCain's. Did you hear Obama's speech? Tying McCain to Bush is as low class as it gets because McCain is no way another George W. Bush. He has many differences with Bush regarding many political issues. Democrat strategy. Also, Obama took McCain's answer out of context when Obama mentioned in his speech that McCain considered someone middle class as someone that made 5million dollars or more. The context of that was in an interview when McCain answered that way in a joke and he even said afterward that Obama would use that out of context and use it entirely out of context he did. The truth was that Obama's speech was negative, but negative in a bad way because it didn't paint diferences between McCain and him. It attacked McCain on the basis of lies, argueing that McCain would be as bad as these past 8 years. That McCain is more of the same, when in reality, Obama's politics represent change for the worse. If you took a REAL listen at Palin's speech, it was harsh. It was critical of Obama. But it was honest and not untrue like Obama's quips against McCain. Many great lines from Palin's speech was negative by attacking Obama but spoke the truth. One of my favorites that I will remember forever: "Some people [referring to Obama] use change to promote their careers, while some people, like John McCain, use their careers to promote change!!!" That attack on Obama is absolutely true because McCain has spent his entire career in Congress promoting change and making lives of Americans better. He has passed legislation that helps American families. Obama puts his party and his politics before his country when he never once refused to reach across the aisle to work with Republicans whil McCain has spent his entire career as a maverick and reached across the aisle to work with Democrats too many times to count. McCain has consistently put his country first, his party second. Obama has not. He has cared about his political gain over his country and is the typical kind of politician in Washington. As Joe Liebermann said, "These are not ordinary times. This is no ordinary election. And John McCain is no ordinary man!" Palin's attacks on Obama were not insulting because they spoke the truth while Obama's attacks on McCain were truly insulting because they lied about McCain. There are facts to back up Palin's attacks on Obama. There are no facts to back up Obama's attacks on McCain because they simply aren't true.
So after you read that long response of mines to Kristi's comment, please check out my blog in which I do put up new political posts/news every single day:
www.theHLopinion.blogspot.com
Howard stop promoting your blog on mine. lol
Post a Comment